Constitutionality of the health insurance mandate

Now that two lower courts have ruled in favor of the constitutionality of the individual “mandate” (requirement) provision of the Affordable Health Care Act, and two other courts have ruled against it, the question now goes to the U.S. Supreme Court, but not on the “fast track” for immediate resolution. What are the issues, and what is the likely outcome?Even many supporters of the derisively labelled “Obamacare,” and its predecessor, “Romneycare” in Massachusettts, are understandably concerned that the requirement that all citizens purchase private health insurance is an unconstitutional overreach of the power of Congress “to regulate commerce” under Article I, Section 8.3.Both Obamacare and Romneycare share the same vice: They both drive individual citizens into the open, waiting arms of the for-profit, private insurance industry, forcing the citizen to buy a product he may or may not want at a premium price defined by the so-called “free” market. Since when can government, under the banner of regulating commerce, have the right to force you to buy an automobile or a washing machine? Don’t you have a right not to buy? Is such “economic inactivity” still “ economic commerce” ?The error here is to think that the “commerce clause” is the key to the debate. Of course, the federal government has many constitutionally specified powers, such as the right to impose a military draft or require jury duty. But health care is not specified. The controlling source of authority here is the power of Congress “to provide for the general welfare” under Article I, Section 8.1. This is the constitutional basis for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The current argument in the lower courts over what is or is not “commerce” is irrelevant to the basic question of mandated health insurance.Where government legally creates or runs a public program to serve the general welfare, the government can require citizens to participate in it and pay for it, for example by exercising the power to tax. If the “Obamacare” health reform had been legislated as a tax or contribution to a “single-payer” system, then the constitutional question would not have arisen. Unfortunately, single payer wasn’t even debated in Congress, let alone voted for or against.Alternatively, Obamacare might have decided to, and still could, offer a government-run “public option” that would be one of many choices in a health insurance “exchange basket,” which would also include qualified private insurance policies meeting reform standards. Citizens could opt for public or private coverage depending on personal preference, but everyone would have access to affordable care. The inclusion of a public option in the mix is what would place the Obamacare mandate under the authority and protection of the Constitution, while pushing down costs.There is an analogy to the automobile purchase situation mentioned above. We do not force a person to buy or drive an automobile. But if a person elects to own and drive one, we do require auto registration, plates, a driver’s license and insurance from a private company. The reason has little to do with regulation of commerce but everything to do with the safety and welfare of the public. It recognizes that the driver’s behavior is a risk and a cost to others. The unlicensed, uninsured driver is a danger to the general welfare.This may be the ultimate controlling issue in the debate over the constitutionality of the health insurance mandate: The failure of some persons to obtain health insurance is in actual practice a risk and a cost to others. The uninsured do in reality become burdens on society, and on federal, state and local, private and public institutions and programs. Although the mandate is not phrased as a tax, in real life the taxpayer is left holding the bag.The U.S. Supreme Court could go either way on this constitutional question, and probably do so by a vote of 5 to 4. It will be a sad day if the United States falls into the cellar of health care performance for its citizens. A better way to solve the problem would be to revive the original proposed public option in a basket of options, which would put an end to the constitutionality question, and more than that, would provide the most effective means of using the competition of the marketplace, combined with negotiated purchasing, to reduce the cost of health care and health insurance for all. Americans deserve nothing less.Sharon resident Anthony Piel is a former director and general legal counsel of the World Health Organization.

Latest News

The artistic life of Joelle Sander

"Flowers" by the late artist and writer Joelle Sander.

Cornwall Library

The Cornwall Library unveiled its latest art exhibition, “Live It Up!,” showcasing the work of the late West Cornwall resident Joelle Sander on Saturday, April 13. The twenty works on canvas on display were curated in partnership with the library with the help of her son, Jason Sander, from the collection of paintings she left behind to him. Clearly enamored with nature in all its seasons, Sander, who split time between her home in New York City and her country house in Litchfield County, took inspiration from the distinctive white bark trunks of the area’s many birch trees, the swirling snow of Connecticut’s wintery woods, and even the scenic view of the Audubon in Sharon. The sole painting to depict fauna is a melancholy near-abstract outline of a cow, rootless in a miasma haze of plum and Persian blue paint. Her most prominently displayed painting, “Flowers,” effectively builds up layers of paint so that her flurry of petals takes on a three-dimensional texture in their rough application, reminiscent of another Cornwall artist, Don Bracken.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Seder to savor in Sheffield

Rabbi Zach Fredman

Zivar Amrami

On April 23, Race Brook Lodge in Sheffield will host “Feast of Mystics,” a Passover Seder that promises to provide ecstasy for the senses.

“’The Feast of Mystics’ was a title we used for events back when I was running The New Shul,” said Rabbi Zach Fredman of his time at the independent creative community in the West Village in New York City.

Keep ReadingShow less
Art scholarship now honors HVRHS teacher Warren Prindle

Warren Prindle

Patrick L. Sullivan

Legendary American artist Jasper Johns, perhaps best known for his encaustic depictions of the U.S. flag, formed the Foundation for Contemporary Arts in 1963, operating the volunteer-run foundation in his New York City artist studio with the help of his co-founder, the late American composer and music theorist John Cage. Although Johns stepped down from his chair position in 2015, today the Foundation for Community Arts continues its pledge to sponsor emerging artists, with one of its exemplary honors being an $80 thousand dollar scholarship given to a graduating senior from Housatonic Valley Regional High School who is continuing his or her visual arts education on a college level. The award, first established in 2004, is distributed in annual amounts of $20,000 for four years of university education.

In 2024, the Contemporary Visual Arts Scholarship was renamed the Warren Prindle Arts Scholarship. A longtime art educator and mentor to young artists at HVRHS, Prindle announced that he will be retiring from teaching at the end of the 2023-24 school year. Recently in 2022, Prindle helped establish the school’s new Kearcher-Monsell Gallery in the library and recruited a team of student interns to help curate and exhibit shows of both student and community-based professional artists. One of Kearcher-Monsell’s early exhibitions featured the work of Theda Galvin, who was later announced as the 2023 winner of the foundation’s $80,000 scholarship. Prindle has also championed the continuation of the annual Blue and Gold juried student art show, which invites the public to both view and purchase student work in multiple mediums, including painting, photography, and sculpture.

Keep ReadingShow less