Roe v. Wade out; what’s next?

When the Supreme Court overturned the almost 50-year-old landmark decision Roe v. Wade on Friday, June 24, which had up until then protected a woman’s right to a safe and legal abortion, it reversed vital precedent.

In doing so, the bombshell decision was only the third time the highest court in the USA set a precedent that took away an individual’s right rather than expanded it — which is dangerous and tragic for our democracy.

For once the court establishes such a pattern, it could set the course for placing other constitutional rights most Americans take for granted at risk.

In fact, this ruling could crack the door and let courts potentially overturn rulings on same-sex marriage, contraception and other rights U.S. citizens hold near and dear in the immediate future. The justices have reportedly already been debating those points.

With conservative Justice Samuel Alito writing the majority opinion on Friday’s abortion case, a woman’s constitutional right to get an abortion is no longer federally protected.

Think about that for a moment. This country is actually going backwards. What if that were the case with how the U.S. progressed in terms of science, technology or any other modern-day innovations? Would our leaders — our mostly male leaders — support such laws then?   

So, who, exactly are these justices to deny so many millions of American woman, trans and/or non-binary individuals such a basic freedom? Who are the politicians, the religious leaders and the many other abortion opponents who have fought for five decades — and now succeeded — in making an essential medical procedure unavailable to patients who require it?

Are they medically trained, psychologically equipped and qualified to evaluate and then forbid patients to make decisions regarding their own bodies?

Would you like a stranger to prevent you or one of your loved ones from accessing essential medical care — or be ordered to carry a child to full term — even if you were a victim of incest, rape, if you have serious health issues or if you don’t have the mental, emotional or financial ability to deal with a pregnancy? What if that pregnancy was life-threatening?

Would you want to have another person, completely unfamiliar with your life, making your decisions for you? It’s doubtful, and there’s no reason why you or others should have to do so. Not in the year 2022, and certainly not in the United States of America, which has always served as a beacon of democracy and personal freedom to the rest of the world. Those rights should continue to grow into the future, not decline.

Interestingly, according to an excellent May 4 article in The New Yorker written by Jill Lepore entitled, “Of Course the Constitution Has Nothing to Say About Abortion,” it states,  “There is nothing in that document about women at all. Most consequentially, there is nothing in that document — or in the circumstances under which it was written — that suggests its authors imagined women as part of the political community embraced by the phrase ‘We the People.’”

Perhaps that isn’t terribly surprising. What’s sadly less surprising is that not much seems to have changed in the last 235 years.

Immediately after the court handed down its ruling, tens of millions of women lost access to safe and legal abortions, putting their health at risk. While the ruling itself didn’t initiate a ban, it gave states almost limitless power to do so.

The question one must now ask: Which basic right will we lose next?


Hearts broken

This is a week when The Lakeville Journal family is feeling the full onslaught of immeasurable grief, in the loss of one of our own. Former Lakeville Journal executive editor and current Compass editor Cynthia Hochswender has lost her 28-year-old daughter Kate to suicide.

There are too many families who must deal with this kind of loss now, and our hearts are with Cynthia, her family and friends as they cope with this tragedy.

There are clearly no guarantees in life, but if you know of someone who you believe might benefit from your help in a time of crisis, reach out to them and do your best to offer support. It’s all any of us can do.

Latest News

Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less
StepCrew stomps Norfolk Library for St. Patrick’s Day

As legend has it, St. Patrick was brought to the Emerald Isle when he was kidnapped by pirates and enslaved.

Though he eventually escaped, he returned and advanced Christianity throughout the island, according to his short biography, the “Confessio.”

Keep ReadingShow less
World War II drama on the stage in Copake

Constance Lopez, left, and Karissa Payson in "A Shayna Maidel," onstage through Sunday, March 24, at the Copake Grange.

Stephen Sanborn

There are three opportunities coming up in March — the 22nd, 23rd and 24th — to be transported through time and memory when The Two of Us Productions presents “A Shayna Maidel” at the Copake Grange.

Director Stephen Sanborn brings to life Barbara Lebow’s award-winning drama, weaving together the poignant reunion of two sisters after World War II through the haunting echoes of their past.

Keep ReadingShow less