There should be no free ride at Region One

The following is edited from the statement read and submitted to the Region One Board of Education at a special meeting March 24, 2011: I voted no to pay raises and contract extensions for the Region One superintendent and assistant superintendent because these top administrators — whose combined salaries and benefits of almost $300,000 represent close to 2 percent of the regional budget — should be held accountable for their share of responsibility for the recent major eruptions and resulting disharmony at our high school. That the recommendation for contract extensions and raises came from the All Boards Chairs Committee at a time when Connecticut taxpayers are being promised even more stringent state budget cuts and higher taxes over the next few years shows a lack of knowledge and application of sound management practices.Management, in this case the board, should have the opportunity to evaluate an employee annually and reward or not reward that employee’s job performance. These two employees will have a free ride in terms of job evaluations for three years if taxpayers in the region approve the budget at the referendum in May. By moving the superintendent’s contract termination date from June 2013 to June 2014 and the assistant superintendent’s contract termination date from June 2012 to June 2014, the board will have abdicated its proper role by making job performance evaluations a moot point. If the board were to find it was in the best interest of Region One to sever the work relationship with either the superintendent or the assistant superintendent while a contract is still in effect, it would cost the taxpayers at least $200,000 to move that employee out. It is irresponsible and arrogant on the part of the board to potentially place that kind of burden on the taxpayers who have so generously supported our high school.The Pingpank Report found the Regional Schools Services Center — which some people call the central office — was involved in intimidation, retaliation, polarization and perceived or actual conflict of interest, creating an unhealthy climate for both students and employees. The report was highly critical of the conduct of the assistant superintendent. The assistant superintendent’s behaviors took place under the superintendent’s watch, and the superintendent knew or should have known what was happening, because she was warned about it as long ago as March 2010. From this information alone — without even addressing the issue of student achievement and the fact that last year the percentage of students who met state goals on the Connecticut Academic Performance Test were 61.3 percent in math, 51.5 percent in reading, 46.6 percent in science and 64.8 percent in writing — it seems clear that neither the superintendent nor the assistant superintendent have earned pay raises and contract extensions. The proper course of action would be to put the assistant superintendent on probation. The board should direct the superintendent to counsel the assistant superintendent to moderate her behavior as was recommended in the Pingpank Report. The assistant superintendent’s contract expiration date should remain at June 30, 2012, at which time she will hopefully have modified her behavior enough to be an effective administrator in Region One. If she has not done so, the board should have the ability to terminate her employment and not be dealing with a contract that expires two years later. The board should set annual goals and objectives for and with the superintendent, including some that actually address the recommendations for improving the school climate that were detailed in the $9,000 taxpayer-funded Pingpank Report, and should measure the superintendent’s job performance against these goals and objectives. If the superintendent has not been able to meet those goals and objectives and improve conditions at the school, the board should be able to terminate her contract at the end of June 2013 and not burden the taxpayers with a contract that expires a year later. The board members who voted yes for these pay raises and contract extensions — the representatives from Sharon, North Canaan and Kent (Cornwall abstained) — voted that the academic performance of our students and the disharmony that exists within our high school and the Regional Schools Services Center are acceptable and don’t need to be improved. That what we have is good enough and we don’t need to strive for excellence. Instead, they could have sent a message to our administrators that the students, faculty, staff and taxpayers deserve better. They could have said when the time comes that the top administrators lead the way to better education for our students and a better environment for our faculty and staff, then they could be amply rewarded. But that time is not now.Gale Toensing is the Falls Village representative to the Region One Board of Education.

Latest News

South Kent School’s unofficial March reunion

Elmarko Jackson was named a 2023 McDonald’s All American in his senior year at South Kent School. He helped lead the Cardinals to a New England Prep School Athletic Conference (NEPSAC) AAA title victory and was recruited to play at the University of Kansas. This March he will play point guard for the Jayhawks when they enter the tournament as a No. 4 seed against (13) Samford University.

Riley Klein

SOUTH KENT — March Madness will feature seven former South Kent Cardinals who now play on Division 1 NCAA teams.

The top-tier high school basketball program will be well represented with graduates from each of the past three years heading to “The Big Dance.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotchkiss grads dancing with Yale

Nick Townsend helped Yale win the Ivy League.

Screenshot from ESPN+ Broadcast

LAKEVILLE — Yale University advanced to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament after a buzzer-beater win over Brown University in the Ivy League championship game Sunday, March 17.

On Yale’s roster this year are two graduates of The Hotchkiss School: Nick Townsend, class of ‘22, and Jack Molloy, class of ‘21. Townsend wears No. 42 and Molloy wears No. 33.

Keep ReadingShow less
Handbells of St. Andrew’s to ring out Easter morning

Anne Everett and Bonnie Rosborough wait their turn to sound notes as bell ringers practicing to take part in the Easter morning service at St. Andrew’s Church.

Kathryn Boughton

KENT—There will be a joyful noise in St. Andrew’s Church Easter morning when a set of handbells donated to the church some 40 years ago are used for the first time by a choir currently rehearsing with music director Susan Guse.

Guse said that the church got the valuable three-octave set when Harlem Valley Psychiatric Center closed in the late 1980s and the bells were donated to the church. “The center used the bells for music therapy for younger patients. Our priest then was chaplain there and when the center closed, he brought the bells here,” she explained.

Keep ReadingShow less
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less