Electricity overhaul bill was a fantasy

As often has been reported lately, Connecticut has the highest electricity costs in the country except for Hawaii. For practical purposes that makes Connecticut’s costs the highest, since people in Hawaii can lounge on the beach all day and eat pineapples, sustenance in Connecticut requiring more ingenuity. High electricity costs have been destroying Connecticut’s business and industry.

The Democratic majority in the recent session of the General Assembly realized that something had to be done. With characteristic insight it decided to raise taxes on electricity, postponing the expiration of most of a user fee that had compensated utilities for generating plants they had sold under the compulsion of state law. Figuring that hardly anyone would notice, Gov. Rell, a Republican, went along. So now state government and municipal governments are financed in part by an electricity tax.

Then the Democratic majority passed a bill purporting to overhaul the electricity business generally. The bill would have expanded the Department of Public Utility Control, directed it to try to reduce electricity rates by 15 percent, subsidized solar power projects, created a state agency to purchase and sell electricity, and regulated the electrical consumption of appliances sold at retail. This time the governor vetoed the bill as too vague and far-reaching.

Maybe something could be gained by the government’s purchase and sale of electricity and even by government’s generation of electricity. In some places it has been done well. Connecticut has a few small and successful municipally owned electric utilities. If state government’s purchases got big enough, they might leverage electricity prices down generally.

But as even the largest electric utilities around the country have found, the electricity market is frighteningly volatile. So if a government purchasing agency messed up, it could prove catastrophic to taxpayers, and the chance of this happening in Connecticut would seem greater insofar as state government has no experience in the business.

Do any legislators who supported the electrical system overhaul remember the Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority’s loss of more than $200 million in its electricity sales deal with Enron Corp. a decade ago? Why would another state agency in the electricity business be any more competent than the CRRA was?

As long as state government is taxing electricity for general revenue and electricity costs could be substantially reduced just by eliminating the tax, it’s hard to see justification for grand experiments. Solar power is politically correct but Connecticut’s cloudy climate is not suited to it, and the subsidies would raise electricity costs for many years before producing any return, if indeed there ever was any return. No, Connecticut’s most promising alternative energy option is probably hydroelectric power, but there’s no political correctness in that. The fish and the neighbors wouldn’t like it.

Perhaps worst of all, the legislation would have frankly turned Connecticut’s electricity system into a welfare agency, requiring electricity suppliers to offer discounted rates to low-income customers, the cost being recovered through higher rates for everyone else, as if electricity buyers have some special obligation to the poor and as if welfare costs also should be hidden in electric bills so people will blame utilities for them instead of the government.

Actually, this is already happening on a large scale. United Illuminating Co., which provides electricity to the welfare hubs of New Haven and Bridgeport, reports that a quarter of its customers aren’t paying their bills. Connecticut Light & Power Co., which serves most of the rest of the state, won’t be as specific but acknowledges that its deadbeat rate is in the double digits. Many if not most households that don’t pay are fatherless, but state government keeps looking for ways to subsidize rather than discourage child abandonment.

State government recently  did find a way to economize. The Division of Special Revenue (mustn’t say “gamblingâ€� when two words of fancy euphemism are available to government) has eliminated its charitable games inspection unit, six employees who had been checking the honesty of fundraising bingo games, raffles and such sponsored by civic groups and churches. Without the inspectors, the charities sponsoring the games will have to do their own checking and their patrons will have to trust them — or maybe just skip the games and send a donation by check instead.

According to a Democratic legislative aide, this is one of the “tough choices� made in the new state budget. Can Connecticut survive that much caveat emptor?

Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester.

Latest News

South Kent School’s unofficial March reunion

Elmarko Jackson was named a 2023 McDonald’s All American in his senior year at South Kent School. He helped lead the Cardinals to a New England Prep School Athletic Conference (NEPSAC) AAA title victory and was recruited to play at the University of Kansas. This March he will play point guard for the Jayhawks when they enter the tournament as a No. 4 seed against (13) Samford University.

Riley Klein

SOUTH KENT — March Madness will feature seven former South Kent Cardinals who now play on Division 1 NCAA teams.

The top-tier high school basketball program will be well represented with graduates from each of the past three years heading to “The Big Dance.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotchkiss grads dancing with Yale

Nick Townsend helped Yale win the Ivy League.

Screenshot from ESPN+ Broadcast

LAKEVILLE — Yale University advanced to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament after a buzzer-beater win over Brown University in the Ivy League championship game Sunday, March 17.

On Yale’s roster this year are two graduates of The Hotchkiss School: Nick Townsend, class of ‘22, and Jack Molloy, class of ‘21. Townsend wears No. 42 and Molloy wears No. 33.

Keep ReadingShow less
Handbells of St. Andrew’s to ring out Easter morning

Anne Everett and Bonnie Rosborough wait their turn to sound notes as bell ringers practicing to take part in the Easter morning service at St. Andrew’s Church.

Kathryn Boughton

KENT—There will be a joyful noise in St. Andrew’s Church Easter morning when a set of handbells donated to the church some 40 years ago are used for the first time by a choir currently rehearsing with music director Susan Guse.

Guse said that the church got the valuable three-octave set when Harlem Valley Psychiatric Center closed in the late 1980s and the bells were donated to the church. “The center used the bells for music therapy for younger patients. Our priest then was chaplain there and when the center closed, he brought the bells here,” she explained.

Keep ReadingShow less
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less