Login

Insight

The irresponsibility of the tabloid press: Free speech, falsehood and defamation

Part 2 of 2

Recently, going through the Stop & Shop grocery check-out line, I picked up two issues of the Globe weekly magazine, published by American Media Inc., formerly owned by Rupert Murdoch.  The tabloid seemed to have two deliberate intentions:  (1) to defame the Royal family of Britain, and (2) to defame liberal Democrats in the USA. 

Responsibility of the electronic media: Free speech, falsehood and defamation

Part 1 of 2

In April 2018, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg made a commendable appearance before the U.S. Congress testifying about the role and intentions of Facebook in the light of the hacking and misuse of cyber communications technologies and social media to skew the 2016 U.S. elections and undermine the democratic process in America.  Facebook had been raided for personal information on more than 87 million unsuspecting users.

The Russian connection and U.S. law

There is much confusion in the mainstream media and on talk shows between the political concept of “impeachable offense” and the legal definition of “criminal offense” in U.S. jurisprudence. How do these two terms apply to the “Russia connection,” if at all? Also, to add to the confusion, a sitting president can be turned out of active office for “inability” to carry out the duties of the office, although technically that “inability” is not impeachable and is not itself a crime.

Presidential powers, missile strikes and sanctions: Evolution of thinking in the world of Donald Trump

Part 1

In 1787, as we all know, the framers of the U.S. Constitution declared that “The President shall be Commander-in-Chief” of our military, and “Congress shall have (sole) power to declare war.”  Unfortunately, the framers failed to anticipate future U.S. missile strikes to punish a foreign country or rogue regime, such as Assad’s Syria.

What has happened to ‘Buy American’ and free trade in Trump World?

What has happened to implementation of the “Buy American” Act of 1933 and the “Improvement” Act of 2017 co-sponsored by Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut? These Acts were intended to protect from foreign competition the U.S. manufacture of certain goods and materials, notably those critical to our national defense.

Let’s finally solve the gun problem

Following the latest school shooting at Parkland, Fla., Trump/GOP spokesmen and NRA proponents were quick to say it’s “too bad, too sad and too soon” to discuss gun control and gun safety. Under unprecedented protest and pressure from students, parents and concerned citizens nationwide, the Trump/GOP apologists have attempted to shift the focus of attention to mental health services ­— a subject they have never spoken about, cared about or provided funding for, up to now.

Is figure skating a vanishing art form?

Over three weeks at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the entire world was rewarded with some of the most brilliant athletic examples of figure skating ever.  But there’s a growing problem:  Under new International Olympic Committee (IOC) rules, performance was judged and medals were awarded mainly on  athletics at the expense of aesthetics. How so?

What’s the evidence for obstruction of justice?

What does one do when accused of a crime? Guilty or innocent, one denies it. A modern version of that is to say it’s “fake news.” So, when President Donald Trump denies the “Russia connection,” and calls the media coverage of the alleged coverup “fake news,” it doesn’t necessarily prove anything, one way or the other.

The Russia connection: Question of violation of U.S. law

There is much confusion in the mainstream media and on talk shows between the political concept of “impeachable offense” and the legal definition of “criminal offense” in U.S. jurisprudence. How do these two terms apply to the “Russia connection,” if at all? Also, to add to the confusion, a sitting president can be turned out of active office for “inability” to carry out the duties of the office, although technically that “inability” is not impeachable and is not itself a crime.